Skip to main content

Research Blog #6: Visual

The graph that I found while doing my research actually comes from one of the studies that I have chosen to use for my paper, "An evaluation and explanation of (in)efficiency in higher education institutions in Europe and the U.S. with the application of two-stage semi-parametric DEA" by Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz. The graph shows the average revenue per student between institutions in each country, and while it is not shown quantitatively on the graph, the article discusses how revenue per student relates to GDP and resources given to institutions in each region (U.S. versus Europe). I thought this image would be useful to my research because it demonstrates that the United States typically has more funding for its universities (which comes in large part from students and families), which drives them to do more research and generate more revenue, making them more prestigious and desirable to applicants deciding where they would like to attend. On the other hand, European universities receive very little funding from students as they run almost completely on state funds, and produce far less revenue per student, making them less desirable for students to attend. This plays a role in the decisions students make about where they are going to study, because American universities are seen as more desirable and will produce a better outcome for students while European universities are not quite at the same caliber.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Blog #9: Argument and Counterargument

Argument: My argument sets out to address why American students are willing to pay more for their education by attending colleges in America when they have the option of practically (or actually) free college tuition in Europe. Students from the United States choose to attend universities “at home” instead of in Europe because of better graduation rates and employability due to a more career-focused model of education, despite rising tuition costs that result from an increase in privatization. Counterargument: My counterargument comes from Caitlin Zaloom’s enmeshed autonomy. As we’ve seen, the higher education system in the US forces students to rely on their parents to help fund their education. Zaloom argues in favor of traditional models of European education because it puts less of a financial strain on students and their families. She also uses Germany as an example because of its free tuition. Families who send their students there are only required to support with living...

Blog #1: Topic Idea

I am thinking about writing my final paper about college in other countries as compared to the United States. During a recent visit to Austria, I learned that tuition is free or very affordable there as well in many other countries, but the attendance there is much lower as high school graduates often choose to go to trade school or enter the workforce. I thought this was very interesting, because in the United States tuition is much higher, and more often than not forces students and their families into debt for many years, but there is so much pressure for high school graduates to attend university. I would particularly like to explore the demographics of students attending universities in both settings.

Literature Review #4

This article covers the noticeable shift of universities in the United States from encouraging study abroad students from going to Europe to choosing other countries, particularly in Asia, Latin America, or Africa. The author discusses how institutions in Europe fear that their partnership with the U.S. may be in jeopardy because of this shift, which could limit them from being able to share resources or laboratories, and potentially making it more difficult for European students to find a place in the United States to study abroad. McMurtrie, Beth. “Is Europe Passe?: As U.S. Higher Education Shifts to a 'Pacific Century,' Europe Feels the Sting.” The Chronicle of Higher Education , 29 July 2013. Social Sciences Premium Collection . About the Author: Beth McMurtrie is a senior editor for The Chronicle of Higher Education in Washington, and she received her master's degree in journalism from Columbia University. She is extremely knowledgeable about the topic of higher ...